Winfield Scott Hancock was one of the
most overlooked Union generals in the entire Civil War, and history doomed him
to share part of his name with one of the most despised generals of the time.
Hancock, a Major General with experience from the Mexican-American War, was
known as “Hancock the Superb”, and more informally by his troops as “The
Thunderbolt of the Potomac”. (Eicher, 2001) But why is Hancock so forgotten? And what did
he do to earn such fantastic nicknames? This writer will answer these questions
and more in this glimpse into the life and military career of Hancock the
Superb.
Winfield Scott Hancock was born on
Valentine’s Day, 1824, an identical twin, in fact, and was named for General
Winfield Scott, hero of the War of 1812. That namesake would come back to haunt
him in his military career, which he didn’t even plan on having throughout his
childhood. But he was accepted to West Point,
and graduated as a second lieutenant in the infantry, just in time for the
Mexican-American War. He earned a brevet, and then was transferred to the
Army’s Quartermaster Depart, where he served as the Assistant Quartermaster
until the outbreak of the Civil War.
Hancock was stationed in California at the start of the Civil War, his biggest
struggle was preventing Union munitions stockpiled in Los Angeles from falling into Southern
supporters’ hands. He was then reassigned to be quartermaster in Kentucky, but General
George McClellan requisitioned him and put a star on his shoulder to command
troops in William “Baldy” Smith’s divisions. Hancock’s first real test came in
May 1862, at the battle of Williamsburg.
He took his brigade and occupied two abandoned outposts, securing the Union’s flank. In spite of the Union
losing the battle, Hancock’s reputation grew enormously, and McClellan saw
great potential in Hancock. In fact, after the battle, McClellan wrote to his
wife, “Hancock was superb today,” in addition to complementing Hancock on his
physical appearance – as Hancock was a very attractive man with a commanding demeanor.
(Jordan,
1988) After this, “the Superb” became Hancock’s nickname for the rest of the
war.
Later, in the September battle at Antietam, Hancock was given command of a second division,
taking over for the mortally-wounded General Israel Richardson. The next
spring, the newly-promoted Hancock took command of another unit for an outgoing
general and began working with General “Fighting Joe” Hooker. Major General
Hancock was replaced for the Battle of Gettysburg, but when his new commander
learned one of his other generals was killed, Hancock took command of the 1st,
3rd and 11th Corps for the duration of the battle. This
was an unheard-of honor, since there was a senior general on the field that
day. However, Winfield even managed to find the time to correct tactical
mistakes at Peach Orchard, and stave off the Rebels’ “Pickett’s Charge.” He was
wounded during the charge, spending about nine months in pain and recovery –
and still recruiting for the Union Army – after his doctors finally removed the
mini ball. It’s interesting to note that in spite of his crucial role in Gettysburg, when Congress
passed a joint resolution thanking the generals that played a key role in the
battle, Hancock’s name was omitted. Some speculate this was because he shared
his name with a failed general from the outset of the war.
After his recovery and return to his
beloved Second Corps, his troops had been reassigned under General Ulysses S.
Grant, who changed the Army’s fighting style to something much more akin to
Hancock’s own. For example, in spite of the Union’s loss at the Battle of the Wilderness
in May 1864, they didn’t retreat; in fact, Hancock led his 2nd Corps
in a counteroffensive against A.P. Hill’s troops, driving the Confederates back
in panic and disorder. If it weren’t for General James Longstreet’s forces
arriving to reinforce the Rebs, Hancock would’ve forced the collapse of the
entire Confederate right flank. (Tucker, 1980) Just days later, the Superb led
his men to capture over 2,800 prisoners at Spotsylvania Courthouse. However, at
the battle at Petersburg,
he deferred command to the current commander on the field, whom he outranked,
due to his lack of knowledge about the battle situation and landscape.
Unfortunately, the field commander opted not to order a final charge, something
Winfield surely would have done, and that final assault would have in all
likelihood ended the war 10 months early.
After his Gettysburg
wound reopened and left him, for all intensive purposes, immobilized, and his
troops faced several humiliating defeats without him, he was recalled to Washington D.C.
His last battle was in October 1864, at Burgess Mill, where the Second Corps
performed soundly under Hancock, by capturing and subsequently losing the
strategic Boydton Plank Road.
After the surrender of Lee and the fall of the Confederacy, Hancock was at odds
with Grant, as Hancock believed in more lenient treatment of the South.
Notwithstanding that, he was assigned as Commander of the Fifth Military
District during the Reconstruction; he also received copious criticism in that
post as well. He issued “General Orders No. 40”, which said in effect that if
there was a state of peace in his district, he wouldn’t interfere with civil
matters, nor would he post soldiers at polling places. He even went so far in
his fair treatment of the South, that when Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, he
was vocally opposed to the execution of Mary Surratt, one of the co-conspirators,
much to the indignation of Northerners.
When Ulysses Grant became President,
Winfield became head of the Department of the Dakotas, until 1872 when George
Meade died, and Hancock assumed his role as Commander of the Division of the Atlantic, or Department of the East. Then, in 1880,
Hancock was the Democratic presidential candidate, and the war hero was very
narrowly defeated by James A. Garfield. Six years later, on February 9th,
Winfield Scott Hancock the Superb died, from complications brought about by his
diabetes. He was 62 years old, and was laid to rest in Montgomery
Cemetery, Norristown, PA.
References
Eicher,
John H., and David J. Eicher. (2001). Civil
War High Commands. pp. 277–78.
Jordan,
David M. (1988). Winfield Scott
Hancock: A Soldier’s Life. Indiana
University Press, Bloomington. Retrieved 2 March from http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/biographies/winfield-scott-hancock.html
Sifakis,
Stewart. (2003). Who Was Who In The Civil
War? Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://www.civilwarhome.com/hanbio.htm
Tucker,
Glenn. (1980). Hancock the Superb. Morningside Books, Dayton, OH. Retrieved
2 March 2012 from http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/biographies/winfield-scott-hancock.html
No comments:
Post a Comment